Jantunen v. Jantunen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jantunen v. Jantunen

505 So. 2d 42, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1045

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 1987·No. Nos. 85-2604, 4-86-1095 and 4-86-1896·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion by the vacation of a default and final judgment. See Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries, Inc., 464 So.2d 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Therefore, we affirm in No. 4-86-1896. In view of this affirmance, the appeals in Nos. 4-86-1095 and 85-2604 have been rendered moot and, accordingly, are dismissed.

Affirmed in No. 4-86-1896. Dismissed in Nos. 4-86-1095 and 85-2604.

HERSEY, C.J., GUNTHER, J., and RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A review of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion by the vacation of a default and final judgment. See Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries, Inc., 464 So.2d 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Therefore, we affirm in No. 4-86-1896. In view of this affirmance, the appeals in Nos. 4-86-1095 and 85-2604 have been rendered moot and, accordingly, are dismissed.

Affirmed in No. 4-86-1896. Dismissed in Nos. 4-86-1095 and 85-2604.

HERSEY, C.J., GUNTHER, J., and RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, concur.

Jantunen v. Jantunen, 505 So. 2d 42, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

505 So. 2d 42 (Jantunen v. Jantunen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related