Jantunen v. Jantunen

505 So. 2d 42, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1045
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 1987
DocketNos. 85-2604, 4-86-1095 and 4-86-1896
StatusPublished

This text of 505 So. 2d 42 (Jantunen v. Jantunen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jantunen v. Jantunen, 505 So. 2d 42, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion by the vacation of a default and final judgment. See Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries, Inc., 464 So.2d 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Therefore, we affirm in No. 4-86-1896. In view of this affirmance, the appeals in Nos. 4-86-1095 and 85-2604 have been rendered moot and, accordingly, are dismissed.

Affirmed in No. 4-86-1896. Dismissed in Nos. 4-86-1095 and 85-2604.

HERSEY, C.J., GUNTHER, J., and RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries
464 So. 2d 1353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 So. 2d 42, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jantunen-v-jantunen-fladistctapp-1987.