Janssen v. State

518 So. 2d 471, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 227, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 148, 1988 WL 2364
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1202
StatusPublished

This text of 518 So. 2d 471 (Janssen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Janssen v. State, 518 So. 2d 471, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 227, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 148, 1988 WL 2364 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction of grand theft but remand to the trial court to allow an assessment of costs upon proper notice and hearing as required under Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). See also Hughes v. State, 510 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Hughes v. State
510 So. 2d 1182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
518 So. 2d 471, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 227, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 148, 1988 WL 2364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janssen-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.