Janssen v. Emery Independent School District No. 1
This text of 258 N.W. 495 (Janssen v. Emery Independent School District No. 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel for appellant in this case conceded upon the oral argument that he could not hope to prevail unless this court should see fit fi> recede from certain views heretofore expressed. After due consideration of the matter we think that we should adhere to our previous opinions, and the judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed upon the authority of Hirning v. Toohey (1926) 49 S. D. 496, 207 N. W. 462; Smith v. First National Bank (1931) 59 S. D. 320, 239 N. W. 942; Tattersfield v. Smith (1932) 60 S. D. 471, 245 N. W. 44; Ruden v. City of Platte (1933) 62 S. D. 175, 252 N. W. 32; Strain v. Potter County (1934) 63 S. D. 24, 256 N. W. 147; Strain v. Potter County (1934) 63 S. D. 157, 257 N. W. 111.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 N.W. 495, 63 S.D. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janssen-v-emery-independent-school-district-no-1-sd-1935.