Home/South Dakota Supreme Court/Janssen v. Emery Ind. School Dist.

Janssen v. Emery Ind. School Dist.

258 N.W. 495, 63 S.D. 352, 1935 S.D. LEXIS 5
South Dakota Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 1935·No. File No. 7776.·Published

Opinion

Counsel for appellant in this case conceded upon the oral argument that he could not hope to prevail unless this court should see fit to recede from certain views heretofore expressed. After due consideration of the matter we think that we should adhere to our previous opinions, and the judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed upon the authority of Hirning v. Toohey (1926) 49 S.D. 496, 207 N.W. 462; Smith v. First National Bank (1931) 59 S.D. 320, 239 N.W. 942; Tattersfield v. Smith (1932) 60 S.D. 471, 245 N.W. 44; Ruden v. City of Platte (1933) 62 S.D. 175, 252 N.W. 32; Strain v. Potter County (1934) 63 S.D. 24, 256 N.W. 147; Strain v. Potter County (1934) 63 S.D. 157, 257 N.W. 111.

All the Judges concur. *Page 353

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Janssen v. Emery Ind. School Dist., 258 N.W. 495, 63 S.D. 352, 1935 S.D. LEXIS 5 (S.D. 1935).

258 N.W. 495 (Janssen v. Emery Ind. School Dist.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. First National Bank
239 N.W. 842 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1931)
Strain v. Potter County
256 N.W. 147 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1934)
Tattersfield v. Smith
245 N.W. 44 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1932)
Strain v. Potter County
257 N.W. 111 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1934)
Ruden v. City of Platte
252 N.W. 32 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1933)
Hirning v. Toohey
207 N.W. 462 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1926)