Janssen v. City of New York

E.D. New York

Janssen v. City of New York

42 F. Supp. 380, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2452

District Court, E.D. New York·Decided November 14, 1941·No. No. 2296·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MOSCO WITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order requiring the plaintiff to pay into the Court the sum of $250 as security for costs or, in the alternative, to file a bond in the sum of $250.

The plaintiff is a nonresident of the State of New York, the defendant is therefore entitled to security for costs. DeRosmo v. Feeney, D.C., 38 F.Supp. 834.

The granting of an order for security for costs is mandatory and not discretionary. Motion granted.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOSCO WITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order requiring the plaintiff to pay into the Court the sum of $250 as security for costs or, in the alternative, to file a bond in the sum of $250.

The plaintiff is a nonresident of the State of New York, the defendant is therefore entitled to security for costs. DeRosmo v. Feeney, D.C., 38 F.Supp. 834.

The granting of an order for security for costs is mandatory and not discretionary. Motion granted.

Settle order on notice.

Janssen v. City of New York, 42 F. Supp. 380, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2452 (E.D.N.Y. 1941).

Pincite

42 F. Supp. 380 (Janssen v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related