Janson Michael Durney v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 2013·No. 09-12-00307-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-12-00307-CR ____________________

JANSON MICHAEL DURNEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11-272011 ________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court convicted Janson Michael Durney of the misdmeanor offense of

failure to identify and assessed a one year jail term and a $500 fine as punishment, then

suspended the imposition of the jail sentence and placed Durney on community

supervision for eighteen months. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.02(b), (d)(2) (West

2011). Representing himself pro se and without claiming indigence, Durney appealed but

did not make payment arrangements for the record. After giving notice and providing an

opportunity to cure, we dismissed the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). We granted

1 Durney’s motion to reinstate after we received the clerk’s record, but he failed to file a

brief. We remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to determine whether

Durney desires to prosecute his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). After conducting

a hearing, which Durney failed to attend, the trial court found that the appellant no longer

desires to pursue the appeal.

Durney’s failure to file a brief constitutes abandonment of the appeal. See Parker

v. State, 69 S.W.3d 677, 678 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.). Durney is not indigent

and has failed to make arrangements for filing a brief. Accordingly, we exercise our

authority to consider this appeal without briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4). We

review the record in the interest of justice. Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1994). Our review of the record has not revealed an error requiring reversal on

unassigned error. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY Justice

Opinion Delivered March 27, 2013 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Janson Michael Durney v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Janson Michael Durney v. State (Janson Michael Durney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lott v. State
874 S.W.2d 687 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Phillip Parker v. State of Texas
69 S.W.3d 677 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)