Jansky v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Jansky v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.

412 F. App'x 221

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 2011

DocketNo. 10-10142

StatusPublished

This text of 412 F. App'x 221 (Jansky v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jansky v. Suntrust Banks, Inc., 412 F. App'x 221 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After reviewing the briefs and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s orders dated September 18, 2009 and December 10, 2009. Among other conclusions, we find Appellant SunTrust Banks, Inc. has not shown that the district court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous in any regard. After de novo review, we also find there is no reversible error in the district court’s legal conclusions under Georgia law.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After reviewing the briefs and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s orders dated September 18, 2009 and December 10, 2009. Among other conclusions, we find Appellant SunTrust Banks, Inc. has not shown that the district court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous in any regard. After de novo review, we also find there is no reversible error in the district court’s legal conclusions under Georgia law.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 F. App'x 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jansky-v-suntrust-banks-inc-ca11-2011.