Janowski v. Przebieglec

114 A. 419, 92 N.J. Eq. 453, 7 Stock. 453, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 234
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 28, 1921·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Ciiiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimisr, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Janowski v. Przebieglec, 114 A. 419, 92 N.J. Eq. 453, 7 Stock. 453, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 234 (N.J. 1921).

114 A. 419 (Janowski v. Przebieglec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hertz Washmobile System v. South Orange
124 A.2d 68 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)