Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Janowski v. Przebieglec

Janowski v. Przebieglec

114 A. 419, 92 N.J. Eq. 453, 7 Stock. 453, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 234
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 28, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 A. 419 (Janowski v. Przebieglec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Janowski v. Przebieglec, 114 A. 419, 92 N.J. Eq. 453, 7 Stock. 453, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 234 (N.J. 1921).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Ciiiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimisr, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hertz Washmobile System v. South Orange
124 A.2d 68 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A. 419, 92 N.J. Eq. 453, 7 Stock. 453, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janowski-v-przebieglec-nj-1921.