Janosik v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
122 A. 370, 99 N.J.L. 279, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 202
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Acicerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Janosik v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 122 A. 370, 99 N.J.L. 279, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 202 (N.J. 1923).
122 A. 370 (Janosik v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ciampoli v. the Prudential Ins. Co. of America
68 A.2d 883 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)