Janosik v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

122 A. 370, 99 N.J.L. 279, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 202
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 5, 1923·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Acicerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Janosik v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 122 A. 370, 99 N.J.L. 279, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 202 (N.J. 1923).

122 A. 370 (Janosik v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ciampoli v. the Prudential Ins. Co. of America
68 A.2d 883 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)