Janos v. Zeidman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Janos v. Zeidman

79 A.D.2d 629, 434 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13980

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.2d 629 (Janos v. Zeidman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Janos v. Zeidman, 79 A.D.2d 629, 434 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 27, 1979 in favor of the defendent, upon a jury verdict. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We fail to find reversible error in the trial court having charged the jury with respect to subdivisions (a) and (c) of section 41 and section 73 of the New York City Traffic Regulations in lieu of subdivision (a) of section 1211 and subdivision (a) of section 1151 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, in light of section 1642 of the latter law. Moreover, the trial court’s charge on interest of witnesses was in no way impropert or misleading. Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 27, 1979 in favor of the defendent, upon a jury verdict. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We fail to find reversible error in the trial court having charged the jury with respect to subdivisions (a) and (c) of section 41 and section 73 of the New York City Traffic Regulations in lieu of subdivision (a) of section 1211 and subdivision (a) of section 1151 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, in light of section 1642 of the latter law. Moreover, the trial court’s charge on interest of witnesses was in no way impropert or misleading. Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 629, 434 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janos-v-zeidman-nyappdiv-1980.