Jannie Robinson Tisdell v. Elizabeth Bryne Hogan

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 30, 2025·No. 24-3054·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-3054 ___________________________

Jannie Robinson Tisdell

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Elizabeth Byrne Hogan, Presiding Judge; Joseph P. White, Assistant Presiding Judge; Keisha N. Robinson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________

Submitted: January 27, 2025 Filed: January 30, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Missouri resident Jannie Tisdell appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of her civil rights action. After careful consideration of the record and the arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the action for failure to state a claim. See Vigeant v. Meek, 953 F.3d 1022, 1024 (8th Cir. 2020) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jannie Robinson Tisdell v. Elizabeth Bryne Hogan, (8th Cir. 2025).

Jannie Robinson Tisdell v. Elizabeth Bryne Hogan (Jannie Robinson Tisdell v. Elizabeth Bryne Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deborah Vigeant v. Michael Meek
953 F.3d 1022 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)