Janney v. State

723 So. 2d 361, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15982, 1998 WL 889241
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 23, 1998
DocketNo. 97-02834
StatusPublished

This text of 723 So. 2d 361 (Janney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Janney v. State, 723 So. 2d 361, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15982, 1998 WL 889241 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Janney challenges the order of restitution entered after he pleaded guilty to a charge of dealing in stolen property. Some of the arguments Janney advances in this appeal were not presented to the trial court. “It is well settled that the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that raised below will not be heard on appeal.” See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992). Furthermore, the evidence presented at the restitution hearing was sufficient to support the trial court’s order. Therefore, we affirm.

BLUE, AC.J., and FULMER and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. State
609 So. 2d 493 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
723 So. 2d 361, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15982, 1998 WL 889241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janney-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.