Janney v. Geiger
13 F. Cas. 351, 1 Cranch 547
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedJuly 15, 1809
DocketCase No. 7,212
StatusPublished
This text of 13 F. Cas. 351 (Janney v. Geiger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Janney v. Geiger, 13 F. Cas. 351, 1 Cranch 547 (circtddc 1809).
Opinion
was of opinion that the first count (upon the mere indorsement of a promissory note not payable to order, without stating any consideration) was bad, but gave the plaintiffs leave to amend.
At July term, 1809, THE COURT (Duck-ett, Circuit Judge, absent) was of opinion that the second plea was bad.
Judgment for the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 F. Cas. 351, 1 Cranch 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janney-v-geiger-circtddc-1809.