Jann K. Jones and Ladon E. Jones v. PlainsCapital Bank
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-12-00272-CV
|
JANN K. JONES AND LADON E. JONES |
APPELLANTS |
V.
|
PLAINSCAPITAL BANK |
APPELLEE |
------------
FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
After Appellants Jann K. Jones and Ladon E. Jones filed their notice of appeal of the trial court’s March 27, 2012 “Interlocutory Judgment by Default,” we sent them a letter informing them of our concern that we might not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the trial court’s order did not appear to be a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order. In our letter, we stated that unless the appellants or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by July 19, 2012, the appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3; see also Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Having received no response, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.
DELIVERED: September 20, 2012
|
|
|
§ |
From the 158th District Court of Denton County (2011-20038-158) September 20, 2012 |
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jann K. Jones and Ladon E. Jones v. PlainsCapital Bank (Jann K. Jones and Ladon E. Jones v. PlainsCapital Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.