Janmeja v. Louisiana

Fifth Circuit

Janmeja v. Louisiana

123 F. App'x 153

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2005·No. Nos. 04-30729, 04-30755·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*

Brij M. Janmeja (“Janmeja”) appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment. Janmeja sued his former employer, Louisiana State University at Eunice (“LSU”) and various others associated with LSU, claiming discrimination, retaliation and a hostile work environment in connection with his race, national origin and religion. Janmeja also brought state law claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation and loss of consortium. Having fully considered the arguments of counsel as advanced in briefs, and having carefully reviewed the record on appeal, we agree with the district court that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the defendants are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

The order granting summary judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*

Brij M. Janmeja (“Janmeja”) appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment. Janmeja sued his former employer, Louisiana State University at Eunice (“LSU”) and various others associated with LSU, claiming discrimination, retaliation and a hostile work environment in connection with his race, national origin and religion. Janmeja also brought state law claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation and loss of consortium. Having fully considered the arguments of counsel as advanced in briefs, and having carefully reviewed the record on appeal, we agree with the district court that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the defendants are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

The order granting summary judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Janmeja v. Louisiana, 123 F. App'x 153 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

123 F. App'x 153 (Janmeja v. Louisiana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.