Janko v. Gates

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 22, 2011
DocketCivil Action No. 2010-1702
StatusPublished

This text of Janko v. Gates (Janko v. Gates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Janko v. Gates, (D.D.C. 2011).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ABDUL RAHIM ABDUL RAZAK AL JANKO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 10-1702 (RJL) ) ROBERT M. GATES, ) ) DONALD RUMSFELD, ) ) PAUL WOLFOWITZ, ) ) GORDON ENGLAND, ) ) REAR ADM. JAMES M. McGARRAH, ) ) RICHARD B. MYERS, ) ) PETER PACE, ) ) MICHAEL GLENN "MIKE" MULLEN, ) ) GARY SPEER, ) ) JAMES T. HILL, ) ) BANTZ CRADDOCK, ) ) JAMES G. ST AVRIDIS, ) ) MAJ. GEN. GEOFFREY D. MILLER, ) ) BRIG. GEN. JAY HOOD, ) ) REAR ADM. HARRY B. HARRIS, JR., ) ) MARK H. BUZBY, ) ) DAVID THOMAS, ) ) THOMAS H. COPEMAN III, ) ) ADOLPH MCQUEEN, ) ) BRIG. GEN. NELSON J. CANNON, ) ) COL. MICHAEL BUMGARNER, ) ) COL. WADE DENNIS, ) ) ESTEBAN RODRIGUEZ, ) ) PAUL RESTER, ) ) DANIEL MCNEILL, ) ) FRANK WIERCINSKI, ) ) DOES 1-100 ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER [Dkt. ## 13, 14~

For the reasons set forth above, it is thisl.1--.day ofDecember, 2011 hereby

ORDERED that Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss Counts Five

Through Seventeen [Dkt. #13], and Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts

One Through Four and Count Eighteen [Dkt. #14], are GRANTED; and it is further

2 ORDERED that the above-captioned case be dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Janko v. Gates, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janko-v-gates-dcd-2011.