Jankelson v. Ruff
29 Misc. 764
This text of 29 Misc. 764 (Jankelson v. Ruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jankelson v. Ruff, 29 Misc. 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).
Opinion
The record is silent as to the Residence of the defendant. In the absence of proof of the jurisdictional fact that he resided within the county of New York, the judgment must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151.
Present: Fbeedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventbitt, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tyroler v. Gummersbach
28 Misc. 151 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 Misc. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jankelson-v-ruff-nyappterm-1899.