Janis Dunbar v. Nancy Pelosi

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5231 September Term, 2025 1:25-cv-00667-UNA Filed On: October 3, 2025 Janis Lavern Dunbar,

Appellant

v.

Nancy Pelosi, Representative (D-CA 11th District) and Ben Crump, Attorney of Law,

Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Millett, Pillard, and Garcia, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s May 28, 2025 order be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that appellant’s claims were so patently insubstantial as to deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009-10 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk

BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk