Janin v. Franklin

4 La. 198
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 15, 1833
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 4 La. 198 (Janin v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Janin v. Franklin, 4 La. 198 (La. 1833).

Opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, delivered by

Martin, J.

The plaintiff is appellant from a judgement of nonsuit, the first judge having been of opinion that in an action f°r the rescission of the sale of a slave, on the grounds of his being without the qualifications, which he had been stated to ° . „ , - , . , , possess in the bill of sale, and which were the principal inducement which determined the vendee to purchase, a tender of the slave must be proven.

We think the district judge did not err. Till the vendee offers to return the slave, he cannot have an action for the price, which is the consequence of the rescission of the sale. It is useless to inquire whether the offer to return the slave must necessarily be averred in the petition, or whether this defect is cured by evidence of the offer.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgement of the District Court be affirmed, with costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Womack v. Lafayette Furniture Co.
50 So. 2d 843 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1951)
Blanton v. Ludeling
30 La. 1232 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1878)
Bowman v. Ware
17 La. 597 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1841)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 La. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janin-v-franklin-la-1833.