Janice Byrd v. Cassandra A. Pyle

902 F.2d 962, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 136
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 18, 1990·No. 89-7225·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to vacate and to remand the case to the District Court, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and this case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to vacate the judgment and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. See U.S. v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk transmit a certified copy of this order to the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Janice Byrd v. Cassandra A. Pyle, 902 F.2d 962, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 136 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

902 F.2d 962 (Janice Byrd v. Cassandra A. Pyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
340 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1950)