Janice Byrd v. Cassandra A. Pyle

902 F.2d 962, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 136
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 1990
Docket89-7225
StatusPublished

This text of 902 F.2d 962 (Janice Byrd v. Cassandra A. Pyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Janice Byrd v. Cassandra A. Pyle, 902 F.2d 962, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 136 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to vacate and to remand the case to the District Court, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and this case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to vacate the judgment and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. See U.S. v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk transmit a certified copy of this order to the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
340 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
902 F.2d 962, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janice-byrd-v-cassandra-a-pyle-cadc-1990.