Janet Roster v. State of Florida
This text of Janet Roster v. State of Florida (Janet Roster v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2023-4107 Lower Tribunal No. 20000442F _____________________________
JANET ROSTER,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County. Shannon H. McFee, Judge.
April 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Mosley v. State, 100 So. 3d 1214, 1216 (Fla. 2d DCA
2012) (concluding “based on the unique circumstances of this case that the State
presented sufficient evidence of the requisite statutory weight for trafficking” when
both “the aggregate substance” and “each individual empty baggie” were found to
contain the controlled substance after chemical testing); Bell v. State, 835 So. 2d
392, 394 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“In considering the motion [to dismiss], ‘the State is
entitled to the most favorable construction of the evidence, and all inferences should be resolved against the defendant.’” (quoting State v. Pasko, 815 So. 2d
680, 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002))).
WOZNIAK, WHITE and MIZE, JJ., concur.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and David L. Redfearn, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Janet Roster v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janet-roster-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.