Janet Feldman v. April Callins

189 So. 3d 357, 2016 WL 1696560, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6420
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 2016
Docket4D15-2735
StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 3d 357 (Janet Feldman v. April Callins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Janet Feldman v. April Callins, 189 So. 3d 357, 2016 WL 1696560, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6420 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An injunction against stalking was issued against Janet Feldman under section 784.0485, Florida Statutes (2015). Feld-man filed a motion to modify or dissolve the injunction alleging, inter alia, changed circumstances. See § 784.0485(10) (a party may move to modify or dissolve an injunction at any time). We find the trial court erred in denying Feldman’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. E.g., Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (stating trial court erred in denying party’s legally sufficient motion to modify or dissolve an injunction without affording party a meaningful opportunity to be heard).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

STEVENSON, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colarusso v. Lupetin
28 So. 3d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 So. 3d 357, 2016 WL 1696560, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janet-feldman-v-april-callins-fladistctapp-2016.