Janes v. Hoehn
2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 245
This text of 2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 245 (Janes v. Hoehn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Janes v. Hoehn, 2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 245 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1888).
Opinion
The jury agreed to each assess the amount of damages, the added total to be divided by twelve, and agreed to and did return the quotient as their verdict. This, was proved only by the affidavits of jurors. .
Held: The evidence was inadmissible to prove such misconduct, Farrer v. State, 2 O. S., 54.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janes-v-hoehn-ohcirctcuyahoga-1888.