Janes v. Hoehn

2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 245
Cuyahoga Circuit Court·Decided July 1, 1888·Published

Opinion

The jury agreed to each assess the amount of damages, the added total to be divided by twelve, and agreed to and did return the quotient as their verdict. This, was proved only by the affidavits of jurors. .

Held: The evidence was inadmissible to prove such misconduct, Farrer v. State, 2 O. S., 54.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Janes v. Hoehn, 2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 245 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1888).

2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 245 (Janes v. Hoehn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.