Janene Renee Randall v. Christopher M. Randall

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: September 4, 2014
• Docket: 09-14-00218-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00218-CV ____________________

JANENE RENEE RANDALL, Appellant

V.

CHRISTOPHER M. RANDALL, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13-04-04378 CV ________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 10, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed

for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the

appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. On June 23,

2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the

appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. Appellant did not respond to this

Court’s notices.

Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and has not shown

that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.

There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the

appeal, and there being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk’s

record, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b);

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice

Submitted on September 3, 2014 Opinion Delivered September 4, 2014

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.