Jane v. Fero

678 So. 2d 496, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8910, 1996 WL 476334
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 1996·No. No. 95-2339·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Richard Jane (“the former husband”) appeals the denial of his petition to modify the child support provision of the final judgment of dissolution which incorporated the parents’ marital settlement agreement. The former husband alleged in his petition that because of a change in circumstances, Sherlene Fero f/k/a Sherlene Jane (“the former wife”) should be required to pay child support in accord with the guidelines, to pay for addi[497]*497tional medical insurance and to reimburse him $600 he paid for the child’s clothing. The trial court denied the petition finding no substantial change in circumstances. We affirm.

A fundamental prerequisite to modification of a parent’s child support obligation is the showing of a substantial change in circumstances. Hirsch v. Hirsch, 642 So.2d 20, 21 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). This change in circumstances must be significant, material, involuntary, and permanent in nature, and the burden of establishing this change in circumstances is on the party seeking modification. Id. Because there was record support for the court’s finding that there had been no showing of an involuntary and substantial change in circumstances, the trial court correctly denied the motion for modification.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jane v. Fero, 678 So. 2d 496, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8910, 1996 WL 476334 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

678 So. 2d 496 (Jane v. Fero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wayno v. Wayno
756 So. 2d 1024 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)