Jane Roe TT 80 v. Doe 1

E.D. California

Jane Roe TT 80 v. Doe 1

DecidedJanuary 13, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-00007

StatusUnknown

This text of Jane Roe TT 80 v. Doe 1 (Jane Roe TT 80 v. Doe 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jane Roe TT 80 v. Doe 1, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JANE ROE TT 80, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00007-KES-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S STIPULATED REQUEST TO SEAL 13 v. DOCUMENTS

14 DOE 1, et al., (Doc. 2)

15 Defendants. 5-DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Pending before the Court is the stipulated request to seal documents by Defendant Doe 1 19 (Doc. 2), filed on January 2, 2025, and emailed to the undersigned’s chambers on January 7, 20 2025. The documents to be sealed are described as the unredacted versions of (1) the declaration 21 of Adam Dawson in support of Defendant’s notice of removal (Doc. 1-18), and (2) exhibits A 22 and B attached thereto (Docs. 1-19, 1-20). (Doc. 2 at 6). 23 The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publ’g Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court 24 for Dist. of Or., 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in 25 Defendant’s notice and request, sealing the documents serves a compelling interest. The Court 26 further finds that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interests identified by Defendant 27 would be harmed. Given that redacted versions of the documents are available to the public (see 1 | that there are no additional alternatives to sealing the documents that would adequately protect 2 | the compelling interests identified by Defendant. 3 | Conclusion and Order 4 Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 141 and based upon the representations contained in 5 | Defendant’s notice and request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unredacted declaration of 6 | Adam Dawson, and accompanying exhibits A and B, lodged with the undersigned in connection 7 | with Defendant’s notice and request to seal filed on January 2, 2025 (Doc. 2), shall be SEALED 8 | until further order of this Court. 9 It is FURTHER ORDERED that within five (5) days of the date of this Order, Defendant 10 | shall submit a copy of this Order, the request for sealing, and the documents to be sealed (the 11 | unredacted declaration of Adam Dawson and exhibits A and B attached thereto) by email to the 12 | Operations Section of the Clerk of the Court: 13 ApprovedSealed @caed.uscourts.gov 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. | Dated: January 10, 2025 | Ww VV KD 16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JANE ROE TT 80, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00007-KES-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S STIPULATED REQUEST TO SEAL 13 v. DOCUMENTS

14 DOE 1, et al., (Doc. 2)

15 Defendants. 5-DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Pending before the Court is the stipulated request to seal documents by Defendant Doe 1 19 (Doc. 2), filed on January 2, 2025, and emailed to the undersigned’s chambers on January 7, 20 2025. The documents to be sealed are described as the unredacted versions of (1) the declaration 21 of Adam Dawson in support of Defendant’s notice of removal (Doc. 1-18), and (2) exhibits A 22 and B attached thereto (Docs. 1-19, 1-20). (Doc. 2 at 6). 23 The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publ’g Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court 24 for Dist. of Or., 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in 25 Defendant’s notice and request, sealing the documents serves a compelling interest. The Court 26 further finds that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interests identified by Defendant 27 would be harmed. Given that redacted versions of the documents are available to the public (see 1 | that there are no additional alternatives to sealing the documents that would adequately protect 2 | the compelling interests identified by Defendant. 3 | Conclusion and Order 4 Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 141 and based upon the representations contained in 5 | Defendant’s notice and request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unredacted declaration of 6 | Adam Dawson, and accompanying exhibits A and B, lodged with the undersigned in connection 7 | with Defendant’s notice and request to seal filed on January 2, 2025 (Doc. 2), shall be SEALED 8 | until further order of this Court. 9 It is FURTHER ORDERED that within five (5) days of the date of this Order, Defendant 10 | shall submit a copy of this Order, the request for sealing, and the documents to be sealed (the 11 | unredacted declaration of Adam Dawson and exhibits A and B attached thereto) by email to the 12 | Operations Section of the Clerk of the Court: 13 ApprovedSealed @caed.uscourts.gov 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. | Dated: January 10, 2025 | Ww VV KD 16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jane Roe TT 80 v. Doe 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jane-roe-tt-80-v-doe-1-caed-2025.