Jane Roe AB 51 v. Doe 1

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMarch 20, 2025
Docket2:24-cv-03488
StatusUnknown

This text of Jane Roe AB 51 v. Doe 1 (Jane Roe AB 51 v. Doe 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jane Roe AB 51 v. Doe 1, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

] 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ? JANE ROE AB 51, Case No. 2:24-cv-03488-DJC-CSK 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED ll STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER D (ECF No. 34) DOE 1, A CORPORATION, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 34), and 16 || finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court's Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The 17 || Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. 18 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 19 || jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 29 || 141 .1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. 91 |} Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for 97 || disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain 93 || jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. 24 25 Dated: March 20, 2025 4 a 26 || 4, janes4s8.24 wie 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28

2:24-cv-3488-DJC-CSK

1 Lisa Dearden Trépanier (SBN 156302) LisaT@trepaniertajima.com 2 Gregory E. Eisner (SBN 190135) greg@trepaniertajima.com 3 Lisa M. Dale (SBN 194688) 4 lisa.dale@trepaniertajima.com TRÉPANIER TAJIMA LLP 5 4605 Lankershim Blvd., Suite 540 North Hollywood, California 91602 6 Telephone: (323) 487-1101

7 Attorneys for Defendants The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 8 and Temple Corporation of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 9 Additional counsel listed on following page 10

11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 Jane Roe AB 51, Case No. 2:24-cv-03488-DJC-CSK

15 District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta Plaintiff, Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim 16

vs. 17 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER 18 THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF

LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a corporation; 19 TEMPLE CORPORATION OF THE

20 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a corporation; 21 MODESTO CALIFORNIA NORTH STAKE 22 OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an entity of 23 unknown form and DOES 4 to 100, 24 Inclusive, 25

26 Defendants.

28 1 Michael W. Carney (SBN 241564) MCarney@sssfirm.com 2 Lauren A. Welling (SBN 291813) LWelling@sssfirm.com 3 Sarah Kissel Meier (SBN 305315) 4 Skmeier@sssfirm.com SLATER SLATER SCHULMAN LLP 5 8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 255 Beverly Hills, California 90211 6 Telephone: (310) 341-2086 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 Jane Roe AB 51

9 Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(b)(1) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court 10 for the Eastern District of California, Plaintiff Jane Roe AB 51 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants The 11 Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Temple Corporation of The Church of Jesus 12 Christ of Latter-day Saints (“Church Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate to 13 the Court’s entry of an order entering the Stipulated Protective Order set forth below. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 Dated: March 7, 2025 TRÉPANIER TAJIMA LLP 17

18 /s/ Lisa Dearden Trépanier 19 Lisa Dearden Trépanier 20 LisaT@trepaniertajima.com Attorneys for Defendants 21 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Temple Corporation of The Church of Jesus 22 Christ of Latter-day Saints 23

25 26 27 28 1 Dated: March 7, 2025 SLATER SLATER SCHULMAN LLP

3 /s/ Sarah Kissel Meier (as authorized on 4 February 27, 2025) 5 Michael W. Carney Lauren A. Welling 6 Sarah Kissel Meier 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Roe AB 51 8

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 3 Plaintiff Jane Roe AB 51 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants The Church of Jesus Christ of 4 Latter-day Saints and Temple Corporation of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 5 (“Church Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”) have agreed to be bound by the terms of this 6 Protective Order (“Order”) in this action. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of 7 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 8 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 9 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to, and petition the Court to enter, the 10 following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer 11 blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it 12 affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 13 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further 14 acknowledge, as set forth in Paragraph 15, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does 15 not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; United States District Court for the 16 Eastern District of California, Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed 17 and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 18 material under seal. 19 II. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 20 This Action concerns Plaintiff’s claims for damages arising out of alleged sexual abuse. 21 Church Defendants are alleged to be liable for the abuse. This Action is thus likely to involve 22 confidential medical, religious, and third-party information for which special protection from 23 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is 24 warranted. Such confidential materials and information consist of, among other things, 25 confidential medical records, religious organization records implicating privacy rights of third 26 parties, privileged communications with clergy, and other information otherwise generally 27 unavailable to the public or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure 28 1 under state or federal statutes and the First Amendment of both state and federal constitutions, 2 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to 3 facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to 4 adequately protect information the parties are entitled and/or obligated to keep confidential, to 5 ensure that the Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in 6 preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, 7 and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It 8 is the intent of the Parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical 9 reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been 10 maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be 11 part of the public record of this case. 12 III. DEFINITIONS 13 1. The term “Action” will mean the above-entitled proceeding, Jane Roe AB 51 v. 14 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-03488-DJC-CSK. 15 2. The term “confidential information” will mean and include information contained or 16 disclosed in any materials, including documents, portions of documents, answers to 17 interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, trial testimony, deposition testimony, and 18 transcripts of trial testimony and depositions, including data, summaries, and compilations 19 derived therefrom that is deemed to be confidential information by any party to which it belongs. 20 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jane Roe AB 51 v. Doe 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jane-roe-ab-51-v-doe-1-caed-2025.