Jane Doe v. Heart Solution PC
This text of Jane Doe v. Heart Solution PC (Jane Doe v. Heart Solution PC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 17-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. JANE DOE
v.
HEART SOLUTION PC; BIOSOUND MEDICAL SERVICES; KIRTISH N. PATEL; NIMESH PATEL; NITA K. PATEL
Heart Solution PC, Nita K. Patel, Appellants (D.N.J. No. 2-14-cv-03644)
Present: JORDAN, ROTH and STEARNS*, Circuit Judges
1. Motion by Appellee USA to Clarify Opinion to Affirm District Court’s Ruling on False Claims Act and Common Law Fraud Damages;
2. Unopposed Motion by Appellants for 45 Day Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing and/or Rehearing En Banc.
Respectfully, Clerk/lmr
_________________________________ORDER________________________________ The foregoing motions are considered. The Opinion issued March 14, 2019 is VACATED, a revised opinion will be filed contemporaneously with this order. The revised opinion does not affect the judgment. The parties’ request for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing is GRANTED. Any petition for rehearing must be filed within (45) forty-five days from the date of this order. No further extensions will be granted to either party. By the Court,
s/ Jane R. Roth Circuit Judge Dated: May 3, 2019 Lmr/cc: Paul B. Brickfield Timothy J. McInnis Charles Graybow Mark E. Cedrone
* Honorable Richard G. Stearns, District Judge for the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jane Doe v. Heart Solution PC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jane-doe-v-heart-solution-pc-ca3-2019.