JANE DOE, an individual, and all those similarly situated v. TESLA INC.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedOctober 6, 2025
Docket5:24-cv-02226
StatusUnknown

This text of JANE DOE, an individual, and all those similarly situated v. TESLA INC. (JANE DOE, an individual, and all those similarly situated v. TESLA INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JANE DOE, an individual, and all those similarly situated v. TESLA INC., (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 RYAN A. McCARTHY, ESQ E-Mail: rmccarthy@tesla.com 2 AENGUS H. CARR, ESQ. E-Mail: aecarr@tesla.com 3 TESLA INC. 3000 Hanover St. 4 Palo Alto, CA 94304 650-681-5000 5

6 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP DANA ALDEN FOX, SB# 119761 7 E-Mail: Dana.Fox@lewisbrisbois.com MICHELLE SOTO, SB# 305272 8 E-Mail: Michelle.Soto@lewisbrisbois.com 633 West 5th Street, Suite 4000 9 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: 213.250.1800 10 Facsimile: 213.250.7900

11 Attorneys for Defendant TESLA INC.

13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION 15 16 JANE DOE, an individual, and all those Case No. 5:24-cv-02226-JAK-SP similarly situated, 17 [Hon. John A. Kronstadt, Dist. Judge; Hon. Plaintiffs, Sheri Pym, Mag. Judge] 18 vs. 19 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE TESLA, INC.; BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES ORDER 20 (USA II) LLC DBA GALLERIA AT TYLER; JABARI BARTON MARQUIS; AND DOES Trial Date: None Set 21 1 - 100, inclusive,

22 Defendants.

23 24

27 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or 2 private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 3 purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 4 stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 5 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 6 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 7 limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 8 principles. 9 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 10 The plaintiff in this action seeks information, records, and communications regarding 11 confidential materials, including but not limited to: the design and development of the Tesla App, 12 including the design and development of the phone key and locking system, consumer information, 13 and consumer complaints. This action is likely to involve trade secrets, research, design, 14 development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special 15 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action 16 17 is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 18 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential business 19 practices, or other confidential research, development of technology, or commercial information 20 (including information that may implicate privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise 21 generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from 22 disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, 23 to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality 24 of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, 25 to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for 26 and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of 27 justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties 1 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public 2 manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 3 3. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDER SEAL FILING PROCEDURE 4 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 14.3, below, that this Stipulated 5 Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Civil Rule 79- 6 5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 7 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. There is a strong presumption that the public 8 has a right of access to judicial proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non- 9 dispositive motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City 10 and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 11 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. Sony Electrics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. 12 Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders require good cause showing), and a specific showing of 13 good cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be made 14 with respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The parties’ mere designation 15 of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of 16 competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies 17 as confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. 18 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then compelling 19 reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief sought shall be narrowly 20 tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n., 605 F.3d 665, 21 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or 22 introduced under seal, the party seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by 23 specific facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence 24 supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by declaration. 25 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its entirety will 26 not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If documents can be redacted, then 27 a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise 1 seal in their entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 2 4. DEFINITIONS 3 4.1 Action: Jane Doe v. Tesla, Inc., et al., United States District Court, Central 4 District of California, Eastern Division, Civil Action No. 5:24-cv-02226-JAK-SP. 4.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information 5 or items under this Order. 6 4.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 7 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 8 of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 9 4.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 10 4.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 11 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 12 13 4.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or 14 manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 15 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 16 discovery. 17 4.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 18 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 19 consultant in this Action. 20 4.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House 21 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Garber v. Lego
11 F.3d 1197 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
187 F.R.D. 576 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
JANE DOE, an individual, and all those similarly situated v. TESLA INC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jane-doe-an-individual-and-all-those-similarly-situated-v-tesla-inc-cacd-2025.