Janderup v. Raritan River Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Janderup v. Raritan River Railroad

102 A. 1053, 91 N.J.L. 327, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 260

DecidedNovember 19, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A. 1053 (Janderup v. Raritan River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Janderup v. Raritan River Railroad, 102 A. 1053, 91 N.J.L. 327, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 260 (N.J. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case tried at the same time as that of Kalleberg, administratrix, against the same defendant, No. 103 of the present term (ante p. 222) and depends on the same state of facts. For the reasons -given in the opinion of this court in that case, the judgment herein will be reversed, to the end that a venire de novo issue.

For affirmance — None'.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppeheimer, Williams, JJ. 13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case tried at the same time as that of Kalleberg, administratrix, against the same defendant, No. 103 of the present term (ante p. 222) and depends on the same state of facts. For the reasons -given in the opinion of this court in that case, the judgment herein will be reversed, to the end that a venire de novo issue.

For affirmance — None'.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppeheimer, Williams, JJ. 13.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A. 1053, 91 N.J.L. 327, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janderup-v-raritan-river-railroad-nj-1917.