Jancu v. Jancu

265 A.D.2d 266, 697 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10883
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jancu v. Jancu. Read the opinion of the Court — 241 A.D.2d 316

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline Silbermann, J.), entered on or about August 6, 1998, which, in an action for divorce, denied defendant’s motion for a mistrial, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record amply supports the finding that the parties agreed to waive their rights under Judiciary Law § 21, and to have this matter decided, based on the trial record, by a Judge who did not preside at the trial. Such an agreement is enforceable notwithstanding “the inevitable credibility issues” that attend oral testimony {Robinson u State of New York, 228 AD2d [267]*26752, 55, lv denied 89 NY2d 812). We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur— Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Lerner, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jancu v. Jancu, 265 A.D.2d 266, 697 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 266 (Jancu v. Jancu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
228 A.D.2d 52 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)