Jan Murray McDonald v. Wells Fargo Bank National as Trustee
This text of Jan Murray McDonald v. Wells Fargo Bank National as Trustee (Jan Murray McDonald v. Wells Fargo Bank National as Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-08-0252-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
AUGUST 5, 2008
______________________________
JAN MURRAY McDONALD, APPELLANT
V.
WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL AS TRUSTEE, ET AL., APPELLEES
_________________________________
FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;
NO. 58985B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Proceeding pro se, Appellant, Jan Murray McDonald, brought this appeal from the
trial court’s final summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Wells Fargo Bank National as
Trustee, et al. (Wells Fargo). Pending before this Court is Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss
for Want of Jurisdiction by which it contends that McDonald’s notice of appeal was
untimely. We agree and grant the motion and dismiss. Final summary judgment was signed by the trial court on March 12, 2008.
McDonald filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law on March 28, 2008.
He then filed his notice of appeal on June 9, 2008. Wells Fargo filed its motion to dismiss
on June 27, 2008. By letter dated July 10, 2008, this Court advised McDonald of the
untimely notice and directed that he demonstrate why this appeal should not be dismissed
for want of jurisdiction on or before July 21, 2008. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). McDonald did
not respond.
A notice of appeal is due within thirty days after judgment is signed. Tex. R. App.
P. 26.1. The deadline is extended to ninety days under certain circumstances. Tex. R.
App. P. 26.1(a). One of those circumstances is timely filing a request for findings of fact
and conclusions of law “if findings and conclusions either are required by the Rules of Civil
Procedure or, if not required, could properly be considered by the appellate court;”
(emphasis added). Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(4). However, findings of fact and conclusions
of law are not proper in reviewing a summary judgment and do not extend the time in which
to file a notice of appeal from thirty days to ninety days. See Linwood v. NCNB Texas, 885
S.W.2d 102, 103 (Tex. 1994). See also IKB Industries Ltd. v. Pro-Line Corp., 938 S.W.2d
440, 443 (Tex. 1997).
The summary judgment was signed on March 12, 2008, making the notice of appeal
due on or before April 11, 2008. The notice of appeal filed on June 9, 2008, eighty-nine
2 days after judgment was signed, is untimely. Consequently, this Court lacks jurisdiction
to review McDonald’s appeal.
Accordingly, Wells Fargo National Bank as Trustee, et al.’s Motion to Dismiss for
Want of Jurisdiction is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jan Murray McDonald v. Wells Fargo Bank National as Trustee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jan-murray-mcdonald-v-wells-fargo-bank-national-as-texapp-2008.