Jan Gajewski v. CMH Parks, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 18, 2012·No. 02-12-00319-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00319-CV

JAN GAJEWSKI APPELLANT

V.

CMH PARKS, INC. APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On August 29, 2012, and September 24, 2012, we notified appellant, in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this

appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: October 18, 2012

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in courts of appeals).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jan Gajewski v. CMH Parks, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Jan Gajewski v. CMH Parks, Inc. (Jan Gajewski v. CMH Parks, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.