JAN CARLOS VALERO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JAN CARLO VALERO, ) DOC #Y38307, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D18-915 )
STATE OF FLORIDA, ) Traveling with: 2D18-912 & ) 2D18-914 Appellee. )
___________________________________)
Opinion filed July 10, 2019.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Jan Carlo Valero seeks review of an order revoking his probation based
on a finding that he committed the new law violation of driving on a suspended license
as a habitual traffic offender. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion
to suppress because the deputy who stopped his vehicle did not have a reasonable
suspicion of criminal activity. For the reasons set forth in the appeal of Valero's
conviction for driving on a suspended license as a habitual traffic offender, see Valero v.
State, No. 2D18-912 (Fla. 2d DCA July 10, 2019), we affirm.
Affirmed.
LUCAS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
JAN CARLOS VALERO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JAN CARLOS VALERO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.