Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank

District Court, C.D. California·Decided June 12, 2023·No. 8:23-cv-00481·Unknown

Opinion

STEPHEN NEWMAN (State Bar No. 181570) ALICE KWAK (State Bar No. 318883) 2029 Century Park East, 18th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086 Telephone: 310.556.5800 Facsimile: 310.556.5959 Email: lacalendar@stroock.com Attorneys for Defendant JAMSHID NAEBZADEH, ) Case No. 8:23-cv-00481-JWH (ADSx) ) Plaintiff, ) [Assigned to the Hon. John W. ) Holcomb] v. ) ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK; BARCLAYS BANK ) ORDER DELAWARE; and EXPERIAN ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action is likely to involve trade secrets, private financial information and records, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, financial records and account information (including records and information implicating privacy rights of third parties), or information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 3. DEFINITIONS 3.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit, captioned Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank, et al., Case No. 8:23-cv-00481-JWH (ADSx). 3.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 3.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 3.4 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: extremely sensitive and/or proprietary “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 3.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 3.6 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDIENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 3.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 3.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 3.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 3.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 3.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 3.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, House Counsel, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 3.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 3.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 3.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 3.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 4. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 5. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 6. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 6.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank (Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related