Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJune 12, 2023
Docket8:23-cv-00481
StatusUnknown

This text of Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank (Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP STEPHEN NEWMAN (State Bar No. 181570) 2 ALICE KWAK (State Bar No. 318883) 2029 Century Park East, 18th Floor 3 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086 Telephone: 310.556.5800 4 Facsimile: 310.556.5959 Email: lacalendar@stroock.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMSHID NAEBZADEH, ) Case No. 8:23-cv-00481-JWH (ADSx) 11 ) Plaintiff, ) [Assigned to the Hon. John W. 12 ) Holcomb] 13 v. ) ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL 14 BANK; BARCLAYS BANK ) ORDER DELAWARE; and EXPERIAN ) 15 INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., ) ) 16 Defendants. ) ) 17 ) ) 18 ) 19 ) ) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 5 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter 6 the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order 7 does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and 8 that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 9 limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 10 applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 11 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file 12 confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures 13 that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks 14 permission from the court to file material under seal. 15 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 16 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, private financial information and 17 records, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical 18 and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure 19 and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. 20 Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 21 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 22 confidential business practices, financial records and account information (including 23 records and information implicating privacy rights of third parties), or information 24 otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or 25 otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case 26 decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to 27 facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery 28 1 materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep 2 confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of 3 such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling 4 at the end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 5 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information 6 will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so 7 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 8 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public 9 record of this case. 10 3. DEFINITIONS 11 3.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit, captioned Jamshid Naebzadeh v. 12 American Express National Bank, et al., Case No. 8:23-cv-00481-JWH (ADSx). 13 3.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 14 of information or items under this Order. 15 3.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 16 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 17 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the 18 Good Cause Statement. 19 3.4 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or 20 Items: extremely sensitive and/or proprietary “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or 21 Items, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a 22 substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 23 3.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 24 their support staff). 25 3.6 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 26 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 27 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDIENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 28 1 3.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 2 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 3 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 4 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 5 3.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 6 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 7 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 8 3.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 9 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 10 counsel. 11 3.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 12 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 13 3.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 14 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 15 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which 16 has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 17 3.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 18 employees, consultants, retained experts, House Counsel, and Outside Counsel of 19 Record (and their support staffs). 20 3.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 21 Discovery Material in this Action. 22 3.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 23 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 24 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 25 and their employees and subcontractors. 26 3.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 27 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 28 ONLY”. 1 3.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 2 from a Producing Party. 3 4. SCOPE 4 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 5 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 6 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 7 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 8 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 9 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 10 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 11 5. DURATION 12 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 13 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 14 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jamshid Naebzadeh v. American Express National Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamshid-naebzadeh-v-american-express-national-bank-cacd-2023.