Jamison v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jamison v. State

489 S.W.3d 333, 2016 WL 2731945, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 463

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 2016·No. No. ED 102912·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert E. Jamison appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert E. Jamison appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Jamison v. State, 489 S.W.3d 333, 2016 WL 2731945, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

489 S.W.3d 333 (Jamison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.