Jamison v. State
This text of 583 So. 2d 413 (Jamison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Willie JAMISON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dawn S. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence as a habitual offender. We reject appellant's contention that chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, amending section 775.084, Florida Statutes, violates the single subject rule of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. E.g., Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990).
HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
583 So. 2d 413, 1991 WL 138898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamison-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.