Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Jamison v. State

Jamison v. State

583 So. 2d 413, 1991 WL 138898
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1991·No. 90-2514·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

583 So.2d 413 (1991)

Willie JAMISON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 90-2514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1991.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dawn S. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence as a habitual offender. We reject appellant's contention that chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, amending section 775.084, Florida Statutes, violates the single subject rule of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. E.g., Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990).

HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jamison v. State, 583 So. 2d 413, 1991 WL 138898 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

583 So. 2d 413 (Jamison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
616 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
James v. State
606 So. 2d 1288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Dehart v. State
601 So. 2d 1344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Coon v. State
605 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Van Bryant v. State
602 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Gilmore v. State
597 So. 2d 374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Henry v. State
602 So. 2d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Beaubrum v. State
595 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Johnson v. State
589 So. 2d 1370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)