Jamison v. Menifee
This text of Jamison v. Menifee (Jamison v. Menifee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
YOLANDA JAMISON,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 11-1132 (JEB)
SYLVIA MENIFEE,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On or around June 3, 2011, Plaintiff Yolanda Jamison filed a one-paragraph Complaint in
the District of Columbia Superior Court alleging that Defendant Sylvia Menifee had defamed
her. On June 20, given that Defendant is an employee of the United States and was sued for
actions allegedly taken while acting within the scope of her office, the United States removed the
case to this Court and filed a Motion to Dismiss three days later. Plaintiff has yet to respond,
despite two prior Orders of this Court notifying her of the obligation to respond. The Court
initially ordered her to respond on or before July 7 or risk dismissal. When no response arrived,
the Court advised Plaintiff on July 19 that failure to respond by July 26 risked Defendant’s
Motion being deemed conceded. As Plaintiff has still not responded and Defendant has raised genuine issues that could
well bar her suit, the Court will, by separate Order this day, find that she has conceded the
Motion under LCvR 7(b).
/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: August 1, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jamison v. Menifee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamison-v-menifee-dcd-2011.