Jamison v. Kolarik, Inc.

Third Circuit

Jamison v. Kolarik, Inc.

327 F.2d 1001

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 26, 1964·No. Nos. 14500, 14501·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the original appendix and of the supplemental appendices filed by the parties by direction of the court and consideration of the briefs of the parties and of their arguments demonstrate no reversible error in the proceedings below. See and compare Spin-ozzi v. E. J. Lavino, 243 F.2d 80, 83 (3 Cir. 1957), and Quinones v. Township of Upper Moreland, 293 F.2d 237 (3 Cir. 1961). Cf. Meehan v. Gulf Oil Corporation 312 F.2d 737 (3 Cir. 1963), and Atlantic & Pacific Stores, Inc. v. Pitts, 283 F.2d 756 (4 Cir. 1960).

Consequently the judgments appealed from will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the original appendix and of the supplemental appendices filed by the parties by direction of the court and consideration of the briefs of the parties and of their arguments demonstrate no reversible error in the proceedings below. See and compare Spin-ozzi v. E. J. Lavino, 243 F.2d 80, 83 (3 Cir. 1957), and Quinones v. Township of Upper Moreland, 293 F.2d 237 (3 Cir. 1961). Cf. Meehan v. Gulf Oil Corporation 312 F.2d 737 (3 Cir. 1963), and Atlantic & Pacific Stores, Inc. v. Pitts, 283 F.2d 756 (4 Cir. 1960).

Consequently the judgments appealed from will be affirmed.

Jamison v. Kolarik, Inc., 327 F.2d 1001 (3d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

327 F.2d 1001 (Jamison v. Kolarik, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related