Jamison v. Kammerer

264 F.2d 789
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 26, 1959·No. Nos. 12766-12768·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These appeals present the same issues as those decided today in Corabi v. Auto Racing Co., 3 Cir., 264 F.2d 784. We note that in thirty-three additional civil actions in the court below Mr. Jamison was named as administrator in order to create federal diversity jurisdiction. We observe also, as in the Corabi case, that the events complained of in these three suits occurred in Pennsylvania and the decedents were residents of Pennsylvania. If the situation presented requires a cure that cure in the present state of the law cannot come from this court. For the reasons stated in the Corabi opinion the judgments will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jamison v. Kammerer, 264 F.2d 789 (3d Cir. 1959).

264 F.2d 789 (Jamison v. Kammerer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Brien v. AVCO Corp.
425 F.2d 1030 (Second Circuit, 1969)
O'brien v. Avco Corporation
425 F.2d 1030 (Second Circuit, 1969)
Lang v. Elm City Construction Company
217 F. Supp. 873 (D. Connecticut, 1963)
Haraburda v. United States Steel Corporation
187 F. Supp. 86 (W.D. Michigan, 1960)