Jamison v. Kammerer
This text of 264 F.2d 789 (Jamison v. Kammerer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These appeals present the same issues as those decided today in Corabi v. Auto Racing Co., 3 Cir., 264 F.2d 784. We note that in thirty-three additional civil actions in the court below Mr. Jamison was named as administrator in order to create federal diversity jurisdiction. We observe also, as in the Corabi case, that the events complained of in these three suits occurred in Pennsylvania and the decedents were residents of Pennsylvania. If the situation presented requires a cure that cure in the present state of the law cannot come from this court. For the reasons stated in the Corabi opinion the judgments will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 F.2d 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamison-v-kammerer-ca3-1959.