Jamil Naba Virginia-El v. Donald v. Lawrence, Detective Arlington Police Department

74 F.3d 1235, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38796, 1996 WL 24690
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1996
Docket95-7557
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1235 (Jamil Naba Virginia-El v. Donald v. Lawrence, Detective Arlington Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jamil Naba Virginia-El v. Donald v. Lawrence, Detective Arlington Police Department, 74 F.3d 1235, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38796, 1996 WL 24690 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1235
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jamil Naba VIRGINIA-EL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Donald V. LAWRENCE, Detective; Arlington Police Department,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7557.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Jamil Naba Virginia-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Croom
650 F.2d 521 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1235, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38796, 1996 WL 24690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamil-naba-virginia-el-v-donald-v-lawrence-detecti-ca4-1996.