Jamil Malik Bey, et al. v. Jarrah Burgin, et al.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

JAMIL MALIK BEY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 2:24-CV-331-GSL-JEM

JARRAH BURGIN, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge John E. Martin’s sua sponte report and recommendation entered on April 17, 2026, at [DE 88]. For the reasons fully explained in the report, Judge Martin recommends that the Court GRANT State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, at [DE 65], and enter judgment in favor of State Defendants and against Plaintiffs. Over fourteen days have passed without any objections being filed, so the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” (citations omitted)). The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Martin’s report and recommendation, at [DE 88], in full, and GRANTS State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, at [DE 65]. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: May 4, 2026 /s/ GRETCHEN S. LUND Judge United States District Court