Jamieson v. Martin
123 A. 357, 99 N.J.L. 508, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 174
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the réasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ohiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Mint-urn, Campbell, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jamieson v. Martin, 123 A. 357, 99 N.J.L. 508, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 174 (N.J. 1924).
123 A. 357 (Jamieson v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.