Jamie W. Turner, wife of_and Ricky Ray Turner, on behalf of their minor child, Lilith May Turner v. Woman&39;s Hospital Foundation

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Jamie W. Turner, wife of_and Ricky Ray Turner, on behalf of their minor child, Lilith May Turner v. Woman&39;s Hospital Foundation

DecidedFebruary 19, 2026

Docket2026 CW 0044

StatusUnknown

This text of Jamie W. Turner, wife of_and Ricky Ray Turner, on behalf of their minor child, Lilith May Turner v. Woman&39;s Hospital Foundation (Jamie W. Turner, wife of_and Ricky Ray Turner, on behalf of their minor child, Lilith May Turner v. Woman&39;s Hospital Foundation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jamie W. Turner, wife of_and Ricky Ray Turner, on behalf of their minor child, Lilith May Turner v. Woman&39;s Hospital Foundation, (La. Ct. App. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JAMTE W. TURNER, WIFE OF/AND NO. 2026 CW 0044 RICKY RAY TURNER, ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, LILITH

MAY TURNER

VERSUS

WOMAN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION, FEBRUARY 19, 2026

D/B/A WOMAN'S HOSPITAL, ET

AL

Tn Re: The Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund and The Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund Oversight Board, through the Nominal Defendant, Woman's Hospital,

applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 657352.

BEFORE : THERIOT, LANIER, STROMBERG, BALFOUR, AND HAGGERTY,+ JJ. WRIT DENIED.

WIL TPS

Theriot and Haggerty, JJ., dissent and would grant the writ and reverse the district court’s judgment which granted the motion in limine filed by plaintiffs limiting the testimony of the medical review panel members to only the medical review panel opinion. Either party shall have the right to call, at his cost, any member of the medical review panel as a witness. La. R.S. 40:1231.8(H). This statute does not place limitations on the scope of such testimony. In fact, panelists may change their individual opinions after the panel’s written expert opinion has been rendered and testify to their changed opinion at trial, so long as the panel’s initial opinion is also presented for consideration. Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hospital, 602 So.2d 1003, 1006-07 (La. 1992). The purpose of an expert report as contemplated by La. Code Civ. P. art. 1425 is to provide the opposing party with advance notice of the expert's opinions and the basis and reasons therefore and the data or other information considered by the witness in forming the opinions. All parties herein were aware that any party could call a panel member as a witness, and it does not appear that the Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund retained a panel member as its expert, and accordingly, all parties had access to the panel members. See Moonan v. Louisiana Med. Mut. Ins. Co., 2016-113 (La. App. Sth Cir. 9/22/16), 202 So.3d 529, writ denied, 2016-2048 (La. 1/9/17), 214 So.3d 869.

WRT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

_

) FOR THE COURT

‘Haggerty, J., serving pro tempore, by special appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JAMTE W. TURNER, WIFE OF/AND NO. 2026 CW 0044 RICKY RAY TURNER, ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR CHILD, LILITH

MAY TURNER

VERSUS

WOMAN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION, FEBRUARY 19, 2026

D/B/A WOMAN'S HOSPITAL, ET

AL

Tn Re: The Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund and The Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund Oversight Board, through the Nominal Defendant, Woman's Hospital,

applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 657352.

BEFORE : THERIOT, LANIER, STROMBERG, BALFOUR, AND HAGGERTY,+ JJ. WRIT DENIED.

WIL TPS

Theriot and Haggerty, JJ., dissent and would grant the writ and reverse the district court’s judgment which granted the motion in limine filed by plaintiffs limiting the testimony of the medical review panel members to only the medical review panel opinion. Either party shall have the right to call, at his cost, any member of the medical review panel as a witness. La. R.S. 40:1231.8(H). This statute does not place limitations on the scope of such testimony. In fact, panelists may change their individual opinions after the panel’s written expert opinion has been rendered and testify to their changed opinion at trial, so long as the panel’s initial opinion is also presented for consideration. Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hospital, 602 So.2d 1003, 1006-07 (La. 1992). The purpose of an expert report as contemplated by La. Code Civ. P. art. 1425 is to provide the opposing party with advance notice of the expert's opinions and the basis and reasons therefore and the data or other information considered by the witness in forming the opinions. All parties herein were aware that any party could call a panel member as a witness, and it does not appear that the Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund retained a panel member as its expert, and accordingly, all parties had access to the panel members. See Moonan v. Louisiana Med. Mut. Ins. Co., 2016-113 (La. App. Sth Cir. 9/22/16), 202 So.3d 529, writ denied, 2016-2048 (La. 1/9/17), 214 So.3d 869.

WRT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

_

) FOR THE COURT

‘Haggerty, J., serving pro tempore, by special appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jamie W. Turner, wife of_and Ricky Ray Turner, on behalf of their minor child, Lilith May Turner v. Woman&39;s Hospital Foundation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamie-w-turner-wife-of_and-ricky-ray-turner-on-behalf-of-their-minor-lactapp-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack