Jamie v. State
914 So. 2d 1015, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17976, 2005 WL 3054046
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2005·No. No. 4D05-3357·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s filing a timely rule 3.850 motion in the proper form.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jamie v. State, 914 So. 2d 1015, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17976, 2005 WL 3054046 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
914 So. 2d 1015 (Jamie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crain v. State
914 So. 2d 1015 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)