Jamie Pearl Jones v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 2018·No. 17-0869·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-869 _____________________________

JAMIE PEARL JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Bruce Anderson, Judge.

August 7, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS, J., concur; MAKAR, J., dissents with opinion.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Six months prior to trial, Jamie Pearl Jones—previously deemed incompetent to stand trial—was adjudged competent to do so based on his lawyer’s stipulation and a new report that Jones had regained competency. The pre-trial judge orally announced his ruling of competency, despite never seeing or seeking a copy of the new report (essentially relying on defense counsel’s stipulation and assertion that the report was “confidential”). A standard form order followed. Under these circumstances, the pre-trial judge abdicated his responsibility to make an independent determination that a once-incompetent defendant has become competent to go to trial. Dougherty v. State, 149 So. 3d 672, 678 (Fla. 2014) (“Accepting a stipulation improperly absolves the trial court from making an independent determination regarding a defendant’s competency to stand trial.”); Belizaire v. State, 188 So. 3d 933, 935 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (finding the trial court’s acceptance of defense counsel’s “stipulation that because both experts found [defendant] competent, they could proceed with the trial” to be insufficient). A remand and nunc pro tunc competency evaluation is required, absent which a new trial is required. See Brooks v. State, 180 So. 3d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“[A] new trial is required only if the trial court is unable to conduct a nunc pro tunc evaluation of the defendant’s competency at the time of the original trial.”).

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jamie Pearl Jones v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Jamie Pearl Jones v. State of Florida (Jamie Pearl Jones v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bernard J. Dougherty v. State of Florida
149 So. 3d 672 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)
Clifton Brooks v. State of Florida
180 So. 3d 1094 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Julian O. Belizaire v. State of Florida
188 So. 3d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)