Jamie Lee Hood-Crossland v. Michael Ray Crossland

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 30, 2018·No. 01-18-00569-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00569-CV ——————————— JAMIE LEE HOOD-CROSSLAND, Appellant V. MICHAEL RAY CROSSLAND, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2016-68169

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jamie Lee Hood-Crossland has neither established indigence nor

paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did

not respond.

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jamie Lee Hood-Crossland v. Michael Ray Crossland, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Jamie Lee Hood-Crossland v. Michael Ray Crossland (Jamie Lee Hood-Crossland v. Michael Ray Crossland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.