Jamie Lee Hood-Crossland v. Michael Ray Crossland

Opinion

Opinion issued August 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did

not respond.

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-18-00569-CV ——————————— JAMIE LEE HOOD-CROSSLAND, Appellant V. MICHAEL RAY CROSSLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2016-68169 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Jamie Lee Hood-Crossland has neither established indigence nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s