Jamie Lavett White v. State
Opinion
V.
Jamie L. White has filed a motion signed by himself and counsel seeking to dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, his motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.
We dismiss the appeal.
Bailey C. Moseley
Justice
Date Submitted: October 6, 2009
Date Decided: October 7, 2009
Do Not Publish
nsel to show this Court how we had jurisdiction over the appeal. Counsel has now verified that this was a plea agreement case.
Because the trial court's certification affirmatively shows Ransom has no right of appeal, because Ransom's counsel has verified that this was a plea bargain case, and because the record before us does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Bailey C. Moseley
Justice
Date Submitted: July 14, 2009
Date Decided: July 15, 2009
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jamie Lavett White v. State (Jamie Lavett White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.