Jamie Jones v. Larry Jester and Sharon Jester

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 26, 2022
Docket06-22-00063-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jamie Jones v. Larry Jester and Sharon Jester (Jamie Jones v. Larry Jester and Sharon Jester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jamie Jones v. Larry Jester and Sharon Jester, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-22-00063-CV

JAMIE JONES, Appellant

V.

LARRY JESTER AND SHARON JESTER, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2022-7773

Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jamie Jones, appellant, filed a notice of appeal in this matter on August 19, 2022. The

clerk’s and reporter’s records were due to be filed with this Court on or before September 19,

2022. Jones is not indigent and is thus responsible for paying or making adequate arrangements

to pay the clerk’s and court reporter’s fees for preparing the records. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),

(c). The Fannin County clerk has informed this Court that the fee has not been paid for

preparation of the clerk’s record. Likewise, the court reporter has informed this Court that she

has not received a designation or payment for the reporter’s record.

By letter dated October 4, 2022, we notified Jones of these defects and provided him an

opportunity to cure them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). The October 4 letter further warned

Jones that, if he did not submit an adequate response to the notice by October 14, 2022, this

appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the

above-cited rules. Jones has not paid for preparation of the clerk’s record or reporter’s record

and has not filed proof of indigency. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. Further, Jones did not respond to

our October 4 correspondence. Accordingly, this appeal is ripe for dismissal.

Pursuant to Rule 42.3, subsections (b) and (c), of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Scott E. Stevens Justice

Date Submitted: October 25, 2022 Date Decided: October 26, 2022 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jamie Jones v. Larry Jester and Sharon Jester, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamie-jones-v-larry-jester-and-sharon-jester-texapp-2022.