Jamie Jones v. Larry Jester and Sharon Jester
This text of Jamie Jones v. Larry Jester and Sharon Jester (Jamie Jones v. Larry Jester and Sharon Jester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-22-00063-CV
JAMIE JONES, Appellant
V.
LARRY JESTER AND SHARON JESTER, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2022-7773
Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jamie Jones, appellant, filed a notice of appeal in this matter on August 19, 2022. The
clerk’s and reporter’s records were due to be filed with this Court on or before September 19,
2022. Jones is not indigent and is thus responsible for paying or making adequate arrangements
to pay the clerk’s and court reporter’s fees for preparing the records. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),
(c). The Fannin County clerk has informed this Court that the fee has not been paid for
preparation of the clerk’s record. Likewise, the court reporter has informed this Court that she
has not received a designation or payment for the reporter’s record.
By letter dated October 4, 2022, we notified Jones of these defects and provided him an
opportunity to cure them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). The October 4 letter further warned
Jones that, if he did not submit an adequate response to the notice by October 14, 2022, this
appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the
above-cited rules. Jones has not paid for preparation of the clerk’s record or reporter’s record
and has not filed proof of indigency. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. Further, Jones did not respond to
our October 4 correspondence. Accordingly, this appeal is ripe for dismissal.
Pursuant to Rule 42.3, subsections (b) and (c), of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,
we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
Scott E. Stevens Justice
Date Submitted: October 25, 2022 Date Decided: October 26, 2022 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jamie Jones v. Larry Jester and Sharon Jester, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamie-jones-v-larry-jester-and-sharon-jester-texapp-2022.