Jamie Arizola v. Cristina Gabriela Rodriguez

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: July 17, 2025
• Docket: 02-25-00172-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00172-CV ___________________________

JAMIE ARIZOLA, Appellant

V.

CRISTINA GABRIELA RODRIGUEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. DC30-FM2024-2644

Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant’s brief was due on June 13, 2025. On June 16, 2025, we notified

appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution

unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal, filed with the court on or

before June 26, 2025, a brief along with a motion reasonably explaining the failure to

file a brief and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1),

42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief, even after we afforded him an

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.

Per Curiam

Delivered: July 17, 2025