Jamie Arizola v. Cristina Gabriela Rodriguez

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-25-00172-CV

___________________________

JAMIE ARIZOLA, Appellant V.

CRISTINA GABRIELA RODRIGUEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC30-FM2024-2644

Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant’s brief was due on June 13, 2025. On June 16, 2025, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal, filed with the court on or before June 26, 2025, a brief along with a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief, even after we afforded him an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.

Per Curiam

Delivered: July 17, 2025